Address each issue using the observation-discussion-recommendation format in a bulleted list. Using this format means:
- Describe your observations.
- What was supposed to happen?
- What actually happened?
- Discuss the impact on the mission, your evaluation and provide a thorough, detailed and concise explanation of the issue (who, what, why, when, where and how). The discussion should include logistics, planning and resources, including personnel.
- Make recommendations for future missions based on the lessons learned.
SAMPLE AAR:
3. INTEGRATION
- Observation: COMMSTRAT in support of Collections. During MEFEX 18, I MEF COMMSTRAT made a concerted effort to inject ourselves into the collections process, both as capability and customer. One issue immediately identified was that commanders/staff were not leveraging COMMSTRAT as a collection plan.
- Discussion: Across the MEF, collections managers were not tracking/depicting COMMSTRAT forces available or employing COMMSTRAT capabilities within the greater plan. While COMMSTRAT has certain limitations (e.g., live-feed, video), we possess other limited asset capabilities (e.g., low/no-light imagery), which can be leveraged to fill collection gaps. With the OccFld merger, COMMSTRAT personnel must be cognitive of legacy COMCAM collections missions in support of battle damage assets, sensitive site exploitation, operational and situation assessment, etc. as outlined in CJCSI 3205.01D and coordinate employment of COMMSTRAT capabilities accordingly.
Additionally, COMMSTRAT personnel must explore methods of employing traditional collections platforms to collect on messaging effectiveness and atmospherics to inform the non-kinetic BDA assessment (i.e., How are we winning (or losing) in the information environment?). To this vein, I MEF COMMSTRAT leveraged the existing Request for Information process to conduct messaging surveys with the local populace; assess local political officers' influencing ability; to acquire imagery of potential enemy actions in order to help develop our understanding of the ever-changing information environment; refine messaging themes and techniques and to prepare preemptive press releases. All these things allowed COMMSTRAT to exploit enemy gaps, promulgate our command's narrative and help 1 MEF sustain its operational tempo.
- Recommendation: COMMSTRAT planners should educate and coordinate with their respective G-2/collection managers to ensure they are sufficiently leveraging COMMSTRAT assets as a collection platform. COMMSTRAT assets should be included in the larger collections plan and incorporated (depicted) within the collections working group briefs. Ideally, collections managers are briefing the capabilities and employment of COMMSTRAT assets in support of objectives.
Summarize key points identified during pre-deployment, deployment and re-deployment. Be sure to link the conclusion to ways to improve future training.
SAMPLE AAR:
Throughout MEFEX 18, I MEF COMMSTRAT learned some valuable lessons regarding proper staff processes (orders cross-walk) and integration (collections processes). I MEF COMMSTRAT made significant steps in educating the staff on the capabilities and value of COMMSTRAT personnel as a collections platform. Additionally, I MEF COMMSTRAT revalidated the need for both primary and alternate imagery transmission capabilities and training, along with the requirement of river city exemptions to effectively interface with external audiences during reduced/restricted communications.